Site Logo, redirects to the Home Page
Free access
Research Article
July/August 2020

Sterilization Central: Water Quality in Medical Device Processing: The Power of Prevention

Water plays an essential role in the processing of medical devices at healthcare facilities,1 including use with critical, semicritical, and noncritical devices. Examples of water's role include:
Point-of-use precleaning, where water often is used during or following use of the device to remove debris.
Manual and/or automated cleaning, where water is utilized to dilute detergents, clean devices, and remove residual patient materials and detergents prior to further processing.
Disinfection, both as the disinfectant itself (in thermal processes) and for the dilution of chemical disinfectants/sterilants and final rinsing to remove harmful residuals postdisinfection.
Sterilization, where water (in the form of steam) is used directly as an antimicrobial or as a source of humidity during chemical sterilization (e.g., with ethylene oxide).
Despite its importance, the quality of the water used often is underestimated. Regardless of appearance, water can be a source of microorganisms and chemicals that can have a negative impact on device safety if used inappropriately during the processing cycle (Figure 1). This is well established in the peer-reviewed literature and highlighted in various processing standards and guidance documents,25 including particular emphasis in the AAMI technical information report (TIR) dedicated to water quality, AAMI TIR34:2014/(R)2017.1
Figure 1. An example of a water sample, before and after heating/drying, showing chemical residuals
To further promote best practices, TIR34 is being revised to increase the level of importance for use and is intended to become an AAMI standard. This is further discussed in this article.

Water Quality: The Power to Prevent

Who is responsible for water quality within a healthcare facility? The adage, “it takes a village,” is an understatement when it comes to water quality in healthcare facilities. The combination of multiple individuals/departments, and their combined expertise, can prevent a problem (seen or unseen) before it affects patient safety. It starts with an understanding of the water quality available from a public source, which varies over time. There are engineering considerations, maintenance requirements, infection prevention input, and manufacturers' specifications and instructions for use, as well as input from those managing or working within processing departments and those responsible for using the devices for their intended purpose. In fact, ensuring water quality requires a good understanding of the entire circle of processing, as an essential part of a quality management system.6
It is easy to take water quality for granted and to defer responsibility to others, but anyone in/or associated with that “village” can be a catalyst for best practices. They have the power to prevent adverse patient reactions and even protect the cost investment for medical devices and equipment at a facility. A useful mnemonic can be the subject itself, WATER, highlighting five important things to consider:
W: Why? Be ready to understand and promote why water quality is important and how it can impact patient and device safety.
A: Analysis. Testing for water quality.
T: Take action. Take ownership in promoting and maintaining water quality requirements.
E: Effects. Be aware of signs that medical devices and processing equipment may be affected by poor water quality.
R: Ready. Monitor water quality and be ready to take action if needed.

W Is for Why?

It may be useful to remember at this stage that water quality can be defined as a descriptor of the levels of various impurities present in water.1 For processing, this can include chemicals, microorganisms, and other materials that may (or may not) be considered safe for potable (or drinking) water but may not be appropriate for use in processing. We can consider negative effects of these impurities in two different areas: chemical and microbiological.
Chemical risks include device or equipment damage, the creation of precipitates on surfaces, and the transfer of toxic levels of chemicals to patients.1,2,7,8 Common examples include the presence of chlorides (or other oxidizing agents) in the water and levels of water hardness (Figure 2). Chlorides are commonly found in potable water, as chlorine or chlorine-releasing agents are widely used to disinfect (sanitize) and preserve potable water. But they also react with metal surfaces to cause damage (e.g., corrosion), thereby allowing rust (brownish-red deposits of iron oxides) to develop and, when concentrated locally on a surface, pitting or cracking to occur. For this same reason, saline (a sodium chloride solution) is not recommended for cleaning metal devices. Repeated exposure, especially from water that is heated (e.g., for disinfection or sterilization), will damage devices over time and reduce their expected life.
Figure 2. Visual indicators of water quality concerns
Remember: If it is in the water or steam, it can end up on the device. Although the visual signs can be remediated, the underlying damage may still be present and can affect safe use and functionality of the device. These microscopic changes also may result in areas on the device surface that may not be decontaminated. A very common precipitate, especially on heating or drying, is hardness (i.e., the presence of dissolved calcium and/or magnesium salts in water). Hardness often is seen as white or chalky precipitates on surfaces. These effects can reduce the lifetime of processing equipment and devices, especially if they are constantly remediated using acid solutions that will dissolve deposits but also can damage surfaces. The introduction of such precipitates into patients, especially when the device is for surgical use, can potentially lead to complications. Other types of chemicals (e.g., copper, iron, manganese) can present a patient risk at higher concentrations and can lead to obvious signs of staining or tarnishing of the device over multiple uses.
Although many of these chemical risks can be seen with the naked eye over time, the microbiological risks typically are not visible. Microbial contamination during the rinse procedure is the biggest risk posed by improper water quality, especially for noncritical or semicritical devices that are disinfected with chemicals. In some cases, even when the water is treated (e.g., filtered) but not correctly maintained, it can be recontaminated due to the presence of bacterial biofilms in the intervening water lines.9 Also, certain types of bacteria that grow well in water (gram-negative bacteria) can release endotoxins that can lead to patient harm; these toxins are not inactivated by thermal disinfection or sterilization.
Remember: If it is in the water or steam, it can end up on the device. Although the visual signs can be remediated, the underlying damage may still be present and can affect safe use and functionality of the device.
During sterilization processes involving moist heat, controlling water quality for the appropriate chemical, microbiological, and endotoxin levels is critical to ensuring that devices that have been exposed to steam are safe for patient use.10 The hidden effects of water quality that can influence processing also include interference with the effectiveness of chemicals used for cleaning and chemical disinfection and shielding microorganisms from sterilization processes.1,7,8

A Is for Analysis

Although certain visual indicators (e.g., being cloudy or discolored) may pertain to the quality of water, the appearance of the water will not provide enough information to meet water quality requirements for processing. Testing is required to determine whether chemical and/or microbiological contaminants may be present. Unfortunately, one test does not provide all of the information needed; however, recommended testing is simple and cost effective to perform routinely (Table 1).1
Table 1. Common testing for water quality
It is important to remember that various sources of water may be used at different stages in processing, so consider identifying and testing all sources. Cold and hot water may be from the same source, but these qualities can be modified due to treatment at the facility (e.g., purification methods, heating, circulation in pipes to the point of use). Although finding different levels of contaminants in hot versus cold water is not unusual, and water may be treated (e.g., via a water softener, by passing through a filter, through purification by reverse osmosis), this does not mean that it is fit for the intended use. Of note, the best place to test water is at the source of where it is used (e.g., sink, washer-disinfector).
Conducting all tests listed in Table 1 may be unnecessary—the selection of the tests needed to demonstrate adequate water quality will depend on the intended use. Clearly, the level of risk associated with water used for cleaning, final rinsing following chemical disinfection, or thermal disinfection or steam generation for sterilization will be different.

T Is to Take Action

With water quality analysis completed, the next step is understanding the results and considering whether taking further action is needed. For the processing of devices, two general categories of water are recommended: utility and critical.1
Utility water can simply be potable water (or water directly from the tap), but the quality of tap water at the point of use needs to be determined. Tap water quality can vary considerably based on geographical region, time of year, distribution systems, and the effects of different treatment processes/chemicals up to the point of use. Therefore, additional treatment may be necessary to meet the quality requirements for this category. A good example is water hardness (e.g., very hard water has been reported in many states in the central and southern United States11), and water softening may be required to meet recommendations for processing.
Critical water, as the name suggests, is used for higher-risk stages of processing, such as final rinsing, thermal disinfection, and steam generation. To obtain and maintain this quality, water must undergo extensive treatment to reach the required specification (e.g., using a reverse osmosis treatment process to remove chemical and microbiological contaminants to low levels).1 The chemical and microbiological recommendations for the quality of these water categories are further defined in AAMI standards and guidance.15
These categories of water are required at different points in device processing. Utility water can be acceptable for noncritical device use, but if used as a final step in processing these devices, one must consider the impact of the presence of high levels of microorganisms that can be present in uncontrolled water and may pose a potential risk to those handling the device prior to or during patient use (even if gloves are used). Utility water is acceptable for initial cleaning processes with semicritical and critical devices (e.g., flushing, washing, rinsing), but as the device gets closer to the end of the processing cycle, critical water should be used in the final rinse steps. When using equipment that performs this step in the process (e.g., washer-disinfector, ultrasonic bath), critical water should be supplied to the equipment for final rinsing.14 Disinfection (thermal or rinsing following chemical treatment) or sterilization processes that use steam also should be conducted with critical water as a source. As stated above, it is important to consider testing the water (or steam) at its point of use to ensure it is acceptable.
For many microorganisms, water is a suitable environment for growth. Care should be taken to avoid conditions in which water can stagnate or introduce additional microorganisms prior to use. A good example is using filters to remove bacteria, but then the water is contaminated during transport through the water line to the site of use.9 It is important to remember that gram-negative bacteria can survive and grow in water (even purified water). These bacteria are important sources of infection and can generate endotoxins that may lead to other patient risks.
With proactive consideration and routine monitoring of water quality, healthcare facilities have the power to prevent negative effects to devices and processing equipment.
In addition to standards and guidance, requirements from processing equipment, chemical, and medical device manufacturers need to be considered. These requirements should be provided through labeling on the product and/or provided with the product (instructions for use). For example, manufacturers may provide recommendations on the quality of the water used to dilute cleaning chemicals or disinfectants to ensure optimum effectiveness, acceptable hardness or proper chloride levels for water used in washer-disinfectors or ultrasonic systems, and to indicate requirements for steam generators. Most device manufacturers will recommend essential standards and guidance for ensuring device safety.

E Is for Effects

The chemistry of water is complex and can interact with various device and equipment materials. These effects can become visible on devices over time, initially eroding materials on a microscopic level before damage becomes visible to the naked eye.1,7,8 Figure 2 provides examples of typical visual indicators related to water quality. These can become obvious on the surfaces of washer-disinfectors and steam sterilizers over time. They will appear rapidly on any heating elements in these or associated systems.
If frequent cleaning or acid washing of the inside surfaces of washers, sterilizers, or associated heating systems is required, then the water treatment system may need to be checked or updated to prevent issues. Delaying this can lead to premature aging or damage to equipment, increasing costs long term to the facility. It is important to note that this may also cause concern for the presence of residuals on devices. Visual indicators can signal problems and the need to take action.

R Is Being Ready

The first priority is to meet patient safety requirements and minimize risks of device/equipment damage or cross-contamination during processing. The steps described above can help to address this priority. The next priority is being ready for audit inspections, as water quality is an essential requirement for device processing as defined in associated standards.24 Health-care facilities also must be ready to understand the maintenance of the water system and to actively monitor for changes in water quality that may occur unexpectedly. This is where the concept of “it takes a village” comes into play, as it is a means of ensuring that the support team is engaged and ready to respond to water quality issues. Not being ready to react can lead to the use of the processing facility being suspended.
The time invested in water quality can help control costs, especially when damage to devices or processing equipment can occur over time. Remediation of these effects can be costly, be time intensive, and result in increased patient risk. Although refurbishing the obvious signs of damage on a visual level may be possible, at a microscopic level the effects of the damage can lead to inadequate cleaning and disinfection/sterilization, can pose toxicity risks, and can increase the risk of device malfunction or damage during use.

Conclusion

With proactive consideration and routine monitoring of water quality, healthcare facilities have the power to prevent negative effects to devices and processing equipment. The actions described in this article will help prevent unforeseen costs and downtime and ultimately limit patient risks from unexpected microbiological, chemical, and particulate contaminants resulting from inadequately controlled water quality. Healthcare facilities should have a team that is dedicated to ensuring best practices in water management, including processing staff, engineering, infection prevention, and suppliers.
The current version of TIR34 provides detailed guidance for healthcare facilities on the requirements for water quality and how to achieve them.1 The TIR, which currently is being revised as a standard, will continue to promote the importance of water quality in the processing of medical devices.

References

1.
AAMI TIR34:2014/(R)2017. Water for the reprocessing of medical devices. Arlington, VA: Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation.
2.
AAMI ST79:2017. Comprehensive guide to steam sterilization and sterility assurance in health care facilities. Arlington, VA: Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation.
3.
AAMI ST58:2013/(R)2018. Chemical sterilization and high-level disinfection in health care facilities. Arlington, VA: Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation.
4.
AAMI ST91:2015. Flexible and semi-rigid endoscope processing in health care facilities. Arlington, VA: Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation.
5.
AAMI TIR68:2018. Low and intermediate-level disinfection in healthcare settings for medical devices and patient care equipment and sterile processing environmental surfaces. Arlington, VA: Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation.
6.
AAMI ST90:2017. Processing of health care products—Quality management systems for processing in health care facilities. Arlington, VA: Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation.
7.
Kaiser HJ, Schwab P, Tirey JF. Spotting, Staining, and Corrosion of Surgical Instruments. www.infectioncontroltoday.com/sterile-processing/spotting-staining-and-corrosion-surgical-instruments. Accessed March 30, 2020.
8.
Kaiser HJ, McDonnell GE, Tirey JF, Klein DA. Water Quality and Reprocessing Instruments. www.infectioncontroltoday.com/environmental-hygiene/infection-control-today-instrumental-knowledge-water-quality-and-reprocessing. Accessed March 30, 2020
9.
Fisher CW, Fiorello A, Shaffer D, et al. Aldehyde-Resistant Mycobacteria Associated with the Use of Endoscope Reprocessing Systems. Am J Infect Control. 2012; 40( 9): 880– 2.
10.
Whitby JL, Hitchins VM. Endotoxin Levels in Steam and Reservoirs of Table-Top Steam Sterilizers. J Refract Surg. 2002; 18( 1): 51– 7.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

cover image Biomedical Instrumentation & Technology
Volume 54Number 4
Pages: 304 - 309
PubMed: 33171509

Authors

Affiliations

Gerald McDonnell, BSc, PhD

Notes

Terra A. Kremer, BS, is a senior program manager in Microbiological Quality & Sterility Assurance at Johnson & Johnson in Raritan, NJ. Email: [email protected] Corresponding author
Gerald McDonnell, BSc, PhD, is a senior director in Microbiological Quality & Sterility Assurance at Johnson & Johnson in Raritan, NJ. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Article Usage

Total views and downloads: 1,019

Citations

Export citation

Select the citation format you wish to export for this article or chapter.

Citing Literature

  • Impact of water quality on reprocessing equipment: Assessment of neurosurgical instruments cleaning and biofilm formation in hospital pipes, Journal of Infection Prevention, 10.1177/17571774241239774, 25, 5, (161-165), (2024).
  • ANSI/AAMI ST108:2023; Water for the processing of medical devices, ANSI/AAMI ST108:2023; Water for the processing of medical devices, 10.2345/9781570208737.ch1, (2023).
  • Analysis of water quality over non-condensable gases concentration on steam used for sterilization, PLOS ONE, 10.1371/journal.pone.0274924, 17, 9, (e0274924), (2022).
  • Quality of water for reprocessing of medical devices in healthcare facilities in Nepal, Journal of Water and Health, 10.2166/wh.2021.071, 19, 4, (682-686), (2021).

View Options

View options

PDF

View PDF

Any member discount will be applied at checkout.

View our Individual and Enterprise packages and learn more about the advantages of the AAMI eSubscription.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share on social media

This site uses cookies. By continuing to use our website, you are agreeing to our privacy policy.

Accept